Employer will not let my husband back to work with a cervical collar

UPDATED: Oct 1, 2022

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

UPDATED: Oct 1, 2022Fact Checked

Get Legal Help Today

Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Employer will not let my husband back to work with a cervical collar

My husband sustained a fracture in his neck in August. His FMLA is expiring. He works for the New Link Destination
wn of Marblehead, Massachusetts. The doctors have cleared him to go back to work, however, he still has to wear his neck brace. The New Link Destination
wn of Marblehead stated that he cannot wear the brace to work, and in order to perform his duties he has to be ‘100’. They feel that wearing this does not make him able to perform all duties. We have a doctors note from the head of Massachusetts General Hospital stating that he is able to go back to work. They also stated that they would terminate his employment due to this brace. Is this legal in the state of Massachusetts?

Asked on November 13, 2017 under Employment Labor Law, Massachusetts


SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 5 years ago | Contributor

It depends on whether it is safe for him to do his work with the brace. The doctor's note is evidence that it would be, but does not control the employer (the town), and the employer may use their reasonable judgment. The law does not require employers to accept enhanced risk of liability, such as from an employee injuring himself further at work, which is something that could result in a legal claim against them. Much depends on what your husband does for the town. If he is an accounts receivables or payable clerk or some other "office" workers, then he should be able to safely do his job, and a refusal to let him work may be illegal disability-based discrimination: a person can work at a desk or in an office with a neck brace. In this case, if he is terminated or simply not put back to work, your husband should contact the federal EEOC or the state equal/civil rights agency about filing a complaint.
But say your husband works in a more physical capacity, such as for the dept. of public works or recreation in a job where he has to move objects, perform maintenance, lift & carry things, push a mower or wheelbarrow, etc. If your husband had a cervical fracture that is not 100% resolved or healed--and if he's wearing a neck brace, it's not 100% healed--it could easily be reinjured by doing physical labor. In that case, it would be reasonable for the town to not re-employ him: the law again does not make the town run such an enhanced risk of liability.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption