Who is responsible for major repairs on home purchase?

UPDATED: Oct 1, 2022

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Get Legal Help Today

Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Who is responsible for major repairs on home purchase?

My sister bought a house 4 montgs ago that
ahe loves. Turns out there are MAJOR water
problems under the house. There is no subfloor
and one of the bedroom floors is buckling due
to water.

The home warranty company said the floor’s
not covered ‘because it’s secondary damage
unless installed wrong.’ Then they said it’s not
covered because ‘it wasn’t installed by one of
THEIR technicians.’

Who is responsible for the cost of these
repairs? Warranty company? Seller?
Homeowner’s insurance?

Asked on September 30, 2017 under Real Estate Law, Louisiana


SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 5 years ago | Contributor

As to the home warranty: a warranty is a contract; it pays for those damages or costs, and only those damages or costs, which it states by its plain terms it will pay for. Review the terms of the warranty: if you believe that they should pay here, you could sue them for breach of contract, or not honoring their contractual obligation to pay when they should. If you can convince a court that under the terms of the warranty, they have to pay, the court can order them to pay (issue a judgment in your favor).
Similarly, insurance is a contract, too: the insurer has to pay when, and only when, the terms of the policy indicate they should. Review the terms of the policy vs. the circumstances or facts in this case; again, if you believe they should pay but are not, you can sue for breach of contract to enforce their obligation to pay. Note that while you must review the terms of your specific policy, generally, insurance pays for sudden damage from an external cause (e.g. storm damage), not due to a general environmental issue (high water table, type of soil, etc.) or from bad construction.
As to the seller: if the seller knew or reasonably must have known (any seller in their position logically must have known) of the water problems, which are a "latent" condition (one not readily discernable to a buyer), but failed to disclose them, that could very likely be fraud, and fraud would provide a basis to sue the seller for the repair, etc. costs. If the seller did not have known and would not reasonably have been expected to now (e.g. they only owned it briefly before selling or "flipping" it, and so may not have enountered the problem), they would not be liable.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption