When a car is totaled and the other driver was at fault, does their insurer settle with me or only with my insurance company?

Get Legal Help Today

Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

When a car is totaled and the other driver was at fault, does their insurer settle with me or only with my insurance company?

My car was hit and totaled on private property, the other driver was determined by their insurance co to be at fault. My insurance valued my car for less than what I still owed on car and I have filed GAP claim for remainder. So what I don’t get or understand is why I am out of a car, the insurance co gets paid for whatever they paid out for my totaled car from the other insurance co and all I get to due is go out and get back in debt for another car with the finance co for someone else negligence.

Asked on September 27, 2019 under Accident Law, Tennessee

Answers:

SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 4 years ago | Contributor

The problem you have is that, leaving your GAP insurance out of it for the moment, in terms of valuing compensation for destroyed property, like a "totalled" car, the law looks to its then-current fair marke value, NOT what you paid for it. The reason it does that is price is all over the place and will lead to inequitable or unfair results. For example, if the law looked to price paid, if you received a car as a gift from a family member (which is not uncommon), then the person destroying your car or their insurer would not have to pay anything, since the car's owner paid nothing for it. Or some people are better negotiators than others--should someone who is good at negotiating the price of a car down get less money when it is totalled than someone who is bad at negotiating, since the bad negotiator would have paid more? Etc.
Also, the current value really is what it is worth now--it's what someone would have paid for it. A car you paid $20k for 5 years ago is simply not worth $20k anymore, so if you were compensated based on its price, you'd receive an unfair windfall: you would have in essence driven for free for 5 years, since you were compensated based on its original price, not what it's worth after 5 years of driving.
Therefore, the law looks to value. But due to depreciation, the current value of a car is almost always less than what you paid for it--or, if you financed it (rather than paying cash on the spot), what you still owe on it. That's why you bought your GAP insurance--to make sure you weren't stuck still owing money on a destroyed car. But you are right that it leaves you out a car: unfortunately, insurance does not fully compensate people for the loss of assets which depreciate in value (like cars or electronics, and unlike houses, gold, or artwork) but that is simply the nature of insurance. It doesn't prevent you from suffering from the loss--it just makes the pain less than if you had no insurance.
 


IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption