What approach should I take against an ER doctor who, after informing him of my asthma, gave me a medicine whose side effect is “can cause asthma”?

UPDATED: Nov 28, 2012

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Get Legal Help Today

Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

What approach should I take against an ER doctor who, after informing him of my asthma, gave me a medicine whose side effect is “can cause asthma”?

Asked on November 28, 2012 under Malpractice Law, Maryland


Catherine Blackburn / Blackburn Law Firm

Answered 10 years ago | Contributor

Why would you take any approach against the ER doctor?  Were you injured?

A medical malpractice case requires four elements -- duty (what a reasonable ER doctor would do or not do under the same circumstances), breach (not doing what a reasonable ER doctor would do), damages (i.e., an injury), and causation (the breach caused the injury).  Proving these elements requires expert testimony (hence, it is expensive).  Many states (including Florida) have special "pre-suit" tasks that must be completed (hence, it is expensive) before you can file suit.  To file suit requires a lawyer (hence, attorney's fees).  To win a malpractice lawsuit requires several legal procedures (which all cost money in addition to attorney's fees).  You can see that a malpractice suit is not cheap.

In the end, your damages will have to pay all of the expenses, including attorney's fees and re-paying your insurance company for your medical bills.  Most states (including Florida) have "caps" on the damages you can recover.  Only after all of the expenses are paid out of the capped damages will you get any money. 

This is why good malpractice lawyers turn down most malpractice cases.  Even if there is malpractice, the potential damages have to be high enough to recover something that actually benefits the injured patient.  If you do not have damages, you have no case at all.  If you have minimal damages, it will not be worth your while to bring a case and most (dare I say "all"?) malpractice lawyers will decline to bring the case. 

If you have very significant injuries and damages, I suggest you consult a medical malpractice lawyer in your area.  If you do not, I suggest you forget about this and count yourself lucky that you were not seriously injured.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption