What to do regarding a defense against a weapons charge when the accussed’s fingerprints are not on the weapon?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What to do regarding a defense against a weapons charge when the accussed’s fingerprints are not on the weapon?
I got charged for brandishing a weapon in a public place.The weapon was not found in my possession and it did not have my fingerprints only the prints of the individual that was pointing it at me are on the weapon. It’s my word against hers. What are my options and what type of time am I facing if convicted? Do I need a criminal lawyer? In Contra Costa County.
Asked on November 2, 2010 under Criminal Law, California
Answers:
M.T.G., Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 13 years ago | Contributor
I think that it may be best for you to consult with an attorney in your area on the matter as you suggested. From the way that you have explained the matter here it appears that you have a good case but all the facts need to be heard. If your prints are not on the weapon then I would not be worried about the sentencing just yet. Let your lawyer get through the evidence - or lack of evidence - and see where the chips may fall. Are you sure that there are no witnesses (either for or against you)? You stated that the charge was in a public place so you never know. You have to make sure that your attorney has all the information he or she needs to defend you. Good luck.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.