We recently purchased a home contingent on a home inspection. The home inspection revealed structural water damage to the floor joists, basement dampness, and small leaks in the roof. We want to terminate the agreement, but the seller is willing to make the repairs. Furthermore, the seller never disclosed the existence of these problems. How can we break this deal?

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

By clicking, you agree to our Terms of Use

Nationwide State Farm Allstate
AllstateProgressiveState FarmPrudentialMetLifeEthos

Table of Contents

Jeffrey Johnson

Insurance Lawyer

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Written by
Jeffrey Johnson
Jeffrey Johnson

Insurance Lawyer

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Reviewed by
Jeffrey Johnson

Updated July 2023

You have an out if the sales contract was contingent not only upon completion of the home inspection but your full approval of the results of the home inspection. That means that there must be a home inspection completed AND you must approve of the condition of the home based on the home inspector’s findings. If the contract was written with only the contingency of getting a home inspection, then once this task was completed, you are obligated to buy the home no matter what the results are. If the contract was written such that, if the home inspection uncovers defects and the seller agrees to and fixes the listed defects, the buyer is obligated to buy, then you are liable. An argument can be made however, that a certain condition such as the damp basement cannot be fixed or fixed properly which may give you the right to cancel the contract. You should consult with legal counsel experienced in real estate seller disclosure matters for his/her opinion after review of the contract documents. If only the Seller had a real estate agent and you did not, there is a question of dual agency and possibly a violation of the real estate agent’s duty and standard of care to you not as a client but as the customer/buyer. In this instance, there appears to be improper disclosure on the part of the seller for misrepresentation and/or non-disclosure of material facts and standard of care liability on the part of the seller’s real estate agent.The seller should have disclosed the condition and history of the roof regardless of it being fixed. You could raise the issue of ” what else was a problem that the Seller fixed and decided not to disclose?” The home inspection is a general visual nondestructive inspection so if there were other defects that were fixed by the seller the home inspector may not have seen it.

Case Studies: Navigating Home Inspections and Seller Disclosures – Protecting Your Rights as a Buyer

Case Study 1: Contingent Home Inspection Results

In this case, buyers entered into a purchase agreement with a contingency clause for a home inspection. The home inspection revealed significant issues, including structural water damage, basement dampness, and roof leaks. The buyers wish to terminate the agreement due to these undisclosed problems. However, the seller is willing to make the necessary repairs.

The buyers can explore their options by carefully reviewing the terms of the contract and the contingency clause. If the contract allows for buyer approval of the inspection results, they may have the right to terminate the agreement if they are not satisfied with the repairs offered by the seller.

Case Study 2: Misrepresentation and Non-disclosure

The buyers discover that the seller failed to disclose the existence of the structural water damage, basement dampness, and roof leaks, which constitute material defects. The buyers consult with legal counsel experienced in real estate seller disclosure matters to assess their rights and options. The lawyer may advise the buyers on potential claims of misrepresentation and non-disclosure against the seller. The buyers can seek legal remedies, such as contract rescission or pursuing damages for any costs incurred due to the undisclosed defects.

Case Study 3: Dual Agency and Standard of Care

If only the seller had a real estate agent and the buyers did not, there may be a question of dual agency and a potential violation of the real estate agent’s duty and standard of care towards the buyers. The buyers can raise this issue with their legal counsel and explore the possibility of holding the real estate agent liable for any improper disclosure or non-disclosure by the seller. The lawyer can assess whether there has been a breach of the standard of care owed to the buyers as customers/buyers without a client relationship with the agent.

Get free insurance quotes or connect with legal experts in minutes

Insurance rates change constantly — we help you stay ahead by making it easy to compare top options and save.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

By clicking, you agree to our Terms of Use

Nationwide State Farm Allstate
AnthemTravelersAetnaPrudential

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

By clicking, you agree to our Terms of Use

Nationwide State Farm Allstate