What are the dangers to a respondent in a default divorce?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What are the dangers to a respondent in a default divorce?
My wife and I recently separated and we have agreed on the division of our property (cars and furniture). All paperwork has been signed transferring the vehicles and car loans, etc. to each other as agreed upon. I do not want a divorce but my wife will most likely file. If she does file and she asks for nothing else in the petition besides the divorce and change of name, do I have to respond? If I don’t, I know that she will be granted the divorce but could there be other legal ramifications I’m unaware of? Will handling it this way cost either of us more money?
Asked on March 7, 2011 under Family Law, California
Answers:
M.D., Member, California and New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 13 years ago | Contributor
If a party is in default, it means that he or she did not file a Response to the divorce summons. Accordingly they will not be allowed to participate in the divorce, and will not receive notice of any court dates. Usually, a default judgment will then be taken. In such a case the petitioner (the spouse who files for divorce) typically gets whatever was asked for in the original paperwork. If you have any further concerns, you should at least consult with an attorney. The cost for an hour or so of their time might be well worth it.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.