Should employees have to pay for embroidery of company logo on thier shirt?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Should employees have to pay for embroidery of company logo on thier shirt?
My employer requires us to purchase our shirts. We can buy our shirts from any retailer but we also have to pay for the application of the logo to the shirt. Is that legal? The shirt cannot be worn anywheres else. Once we are no longer employed by the company we cannot even sell the shirts back, we are stuck with them.
Asked on September 2, 2010 under Employment Labor Law, Louisiana
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 14 years ago | Contributor
It's annoying and it's unfair, but, unfortunately, it *is* legal. Employers can make the purchase or modification of uniforms or work clothes a condition of employment. For example, if you were a machinest, you could be made to get safety goggles, and gloves; doctors and nurses have to buy scrubs; even suits are in often a special work purchase, since nowadays, most men, for example, very rarely wear suits anywhere but at their office. While the logo makes the shirts in your question particularlly ill-suited for any other use, again, employers can require their employees to buy (or pay to modify) work clothing or uniforms--even clothing that has no use other than with/for the employer. Talk to your tax preparer; there's a chance you can at least deduct the expense.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.