Rental Lease Agreement
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Rental Lease Agreement
I am reaching what I thought was the end of my lease term. Upon close examination of my lease, the dates stated would make my lease 13 months instead of 12 months. Everywhere else in the agreement the lease is stated to be paid in 12 month installements of a set rent amount. The only places that reflect that this would be a 13 month lease is in the length of the lease term and the total amount due. Everywhere else the rent is described as being a 12 month period of set rental installments. Is this agreement still binding despite contradictory information? It seems deceitful to hide in the actual terms in the fine print.
Asked on June 3, 2019 under Real Estate Law, California
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 2 years ago | Contributor
It may have been an honest error, not intentional deceit. When there are inconsistencies in a lease or other contract, a court will try to determine what the true intention is. Generally, handwritten or specifically typed in terms will overrule "boilerplate" terms that are part of a downloaded standard lease, since the specific terms the parties added presumably reflected their actual intent, while anything part of a standard lease could have been left in or not changed by mistake. So if the term and the amount of rent were added into a standard lease, they would control.
If everthing is printed the same way, then courts look to see what interpretation is best supported. If the money were only for 12 months, then a court would likely find that the reference to 13 months is an error. But if the term and the amount of money (total rent) are both for 13 months, then a court would likely find that is the correct term, since why would you have agreed to pay 13 months of rent for an only 12-month lease?
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.