Playground Injury Lawsuits

By clicking, you agree to our Terms of Use

Nationwide State Farm Allstate
AllstateProgressiveState FarmPrudentialMetLifeEthos

Table of Contents

Jeffrey Johnson

Insurance Lawyer

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Written by
Jeffrey Johnson
Jeffrey Johnson

Insurance Lawyer

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Reviewed by
Jeffrey Johnson

Updated January 2025

The answer to who’s liable for injuries sustained by a child at a restaurant playground depends on how much your child was at fault, if at all. If he was being reckless in his use of playground equipment and you did not stop him, it is likely that he will not receive damages from the other parties involved or the restaurant. Further, if you were to lose your lawsuit entirely, there is even a chance that you will be liable to the other family on a countersuit, and/or for their attorneys fees as well as your own. However, if your son was playing on the monkey bars in a reasonable way, you will want to examine whether the other child’s actions caused the accident or whether the owner of the restaurant had failed in his duty to provide a safe environment at the restaurant’s playground.

Defining Fault

In addition to making the determinations listed above, there is a need to define “fault,” because fault exists both in a lay sense, and in a legal sense. In this situation, it’s the legal definition that we care most about, since it will determine the answer to whether you, the playground, or the other parties involved will be held liable.

Most jurisdictions practice some form of comparative fault (or comparative negligence). Importantly, comparative fault means that when a plaintiff’s negligence plays a role in his or her own injury, s/he cannot recover if that negligence was as much as or more than the defendant’s negligence. Whether it’s “as much” (50%) or “more than” (51%) depends on the jurisdiction. You’ll need to speak to a local, licensed personal injury attorney for a clear answer.

Sometimes, however, accidents simply happen. There is often no clear fault. Perhaps neither boy was playing inappropriately, and the owner of the restaurant had taken all reasonable care in choosing, installing, and maintaining the equipment. If this is the case, you may not have a legitimate case against anyone. A lawsuit filing in this sort of situation would likely be considered frivolous by the court. This would expose you to the risk of court fees and your attorney to the risk of losing his license.

Getting Help

Because this is a complicated matter, you should contact an experienced personal injury attorney in your jurisdiction to discuss your case. An experienced attorney can review the circumstances involved in your claim and determine if a personal injury lawsuit is worth pursuing.

 

Get free insurance quotes or connect with legal experts in minutes

Insurance rates change constantly — we help you stay ahead by making it easy to compare top options and save.

By clicking, you agree to our Terms of Use

Nationwide State Farm Allstate
TravelersMetLifePrudentialNationwide

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

By clicking, you agree to our Terms of Use

Nationwide State Farm Allstate