Our company says were only entitled to 2hrs of pay for coming in on our day off for a training session

Get Legal Help Today

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Our company says were only entitled to 2hrs of pay for coming in on our day off for a training session

We work as Class A security for a professional
building. This is the third security company that
weve been grandfathered into. The previous two
companies both paid our training sessions at the 4hr
maximum rate whereas this new company wants to
pay us at the 2hr minimum. Seems like there would
be provisions, stipulations and requirements for this.
Need clarification please.

Thank you

Asked on July 23, 2019 under Employment Labor Law, California

Answers:

SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 2 years ago | Contributor

You are entitled to pay for all time spent training: mandatory (that is, employer-required) training is considered work, and so you have to be paid for it. The issue is, how long do you spend training? Whatever it is you have to paid for it--subject also to the fact that in CA, if you are called in for work (including training) you have to be paid (as "reporting time") a miniumum equal to the greater of either 1/2 your normal shift or two hours. That means that if your normal shift is 4 hours or less, your minimum is 2 hours pay; if more than 4 hours, you get a minimum equal to 1/2 your shift; compare that minimum to the amount of time you actually spend training: you get either the actual training time or the minimum, whichever is greater.


IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption