North Carolina Supreme Court to Settle Dispute Over $900,000 Fishing Award
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption




Table of Contents


Insurance Lawyer
Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...
Jeffrey Johnson


Insurance Lawyer
Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...
Jeffrey Johnson
Updated July 2021

The prize was instead awarded to a competing vessel, the Carnivore, which netted a 528.3 pound marlin to claim second place. The owners of Citation claimed that the minor rules violation did not preclude them from the nearly $1 million in prize money, and filed a lawsuit that has worked its way through the North Carolina court system.
Lower Courts Require License
Favoring strict adherence to the rules of the contest, the lower North Carolina courts have all awarded the prize to Carnivore for catching the largest fish without violating the rules. In the most recent decision, North Carolina’s Court of Appeals decided that the rules of the contest were clear, and clearly explained to each competing boat. The competition required all crew members to possess a North Carolina fishing license, and Citation was not in compliance
The Court was not unanimous, however. One judge dissented, arguing that the fishing license was not a significant violation of the rules. Stating that the Citation did not get a competitive advantage because one crew member was without a North Carolina license, the dissenting judge argued that the Big Rock Blue Marlin tournament was still obligated to pay the first prize award to Citation.
Citation’s Argument
Citation has argued that, because they were in federal waters when the fish was caught, they did not need a North Carolina license to legally bag their catch. Further, the boat’s owners argue that the offending crew member was under the wrongful assumption that there was a blanket fishing permit for everyone on the boat, and when he realized his mistake he purchased a license. Unfortunately, he did not realize his mistake until 2 hours after the crew reeled in the prize marlin.
Pointing to the crew member’s seemingly innocent error, and the fact that a lack of a license did not give the boat a competitive advantage, the Citation hopes the NC Supreme Court will overturn the previous rulings. The case is still in the early stages of preparation for the state’s highest court, and a decision is not expected until the court hears oral arguments.
Conflict of Interest
As if the case was not strange enough, there is a potential conflict of interest brewing because one of North Carolina’s Supremes is friends and former business partners with the attorney representing the Carnivore’s claim to the winnings. The attorney claims that the lawyers representing the Citation have not given good reason for him or the judge in question to step down from the case. Before deciding the primary dispute, the court will have to determine whether or not the judge’s ability to rule on the case is in question.
Regardless of the final decision, someone will have a whopper of a fish tale made sweeter by a nearly $1 million prize.
Get free insurance quotes or connect with legal experts in minutes
Insurance rates change constantly — we help you stay ahead by making it easy to compare top options and save.