Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Owners on disclosure did not identify drainage issues on side of the house and I only was able to identify problem due to pouring down rain the day inspector came. I installed a French drain and found out form neighbor that the water had been high enough last year to enter the house, hence flooding the rooms on that side of the house. They did not indicate this on the disclosure either, that there had been water in the house. They had put in new carpet in the rooms. Now that I changed the moisture issues under the house I am experiencing some settling on the slab foundation and cracks in the house. Also, they did not disclose any issues with cracked hardy board on the outside of the house that inspector noted. I am concerned as to what issues might arise due to this as time passes. What do I need to do to question them not disclosing the issues on their report?
Asked on October 13, 2016 under Real Estate Law, Texas
S.L,. Member, California Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 5 years ago | Contributor
You can sue the seller for fraud.
Fraud is the intentional misrepresentation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity and with the intent to induce your reliance upon which you justifiably relied to your detriment.
In other words, you would not have bought the house had you known the true facts.
Fraud is also applicable in cases of nondisclosure where the buyer could not have reasonably discovered the true facts prior to purchase.
Your damages (monetary compensation you are seeking in a lawsuit for fraud) would be either the benefit of the bargain or your out of pocket loss.
Benefit of the bargain means the defrauded purchaser can recover the difference between the real and represented value of the property regardless of the fact that the actual loss suffered might have been less.
Out of pocket damages for fraudulent misrepresentation permits recovery of the difference between the price paid and the actual value of the property acquired.