What are a tenant’s rights regarding a severe roach infestation?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What are a tenant’s rights regarding a severe roach infestation?
There is a severe roach infestation throughout the building. They provide basic pest control but it is not doing anything; we need a professional exterminator. The office refuses to do anything more. But the roaches are multiplying and are literally everywhere.This is not healthy. There appears to have had the problem before; I noticed old bait in the cabinets. What can I do?
Asked on July 19, 2011 under Real Estate Law, Florida
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 12 years ago | Contributor
All leases have what's known as an "implied warranty of habitability." This is a term added ("implied") to the lease which states that the rental premises must be fit for their intended purpose--in this case, residence. A severe roach infestation is often held to violate this warranty; the landlord must resolve or remediate the situation. Depending in the circumstances, you may have the right to terminate (break) the lease and leave without penalty; or to pay for an exteriminator yourself and deduct the cost from rent; or to seek monetary compensation. Since taking the wrong action, or the right action in the wrong way, can result in your being liable to the landlord, you should consult with an attorney to explore your options and seek recourse. Good luck.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.