Is there a time frame were a civil suite due to a car accedint can be dropped
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Is there a time frame were a civil suite due to a car accedint can be dropped
I was in a car accedent back in 02′ I have been taken to court several times and givin the same responce I dont have anything for them to garnish. its also been proven in the courts that i dont have anything. is there a time frame where they can stop trying to collect somthing that i dont have. Its going on 7 yrs now
Asked on May 5, 2009 under Accident Law, Kansas
Answers:
L.M., Member, California Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 14 years ago | Contributor
It is not clear if there actually was a lawsuit filed against you which resulted in a judgment. If that is the case, the law in Kansas is that the prevailing party has 5 years to collect on the judgment. However, in Kansas, the time period is renewable at the court's discretion. In other words, this can go on for quite some time or for the rest of your life. If there never was a lawsuit, the statute of limitations for a claim against the responsible party to an auto accident for both property damage and bodily injury is 2 years, and you would be off the hook. If a lawsuit was filed within the statute of limitations, but never pursued, you can usually file a motion to dismiss the lawsuit after a year. If that is the case, speak to an attorney for assistance.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.