Is it discrimination if female stockers are not required to do the same amount of work as male stockers?

UPDATED: Mar 12, 2012

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

UPDATED: Mar 12, 2012Fact Checked

Get Legal Help Today

Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Is it discrimination if female stockers are not required to do the same amount of work as male stockers?

I work at a national big box store and the female workers get paid the same as males but are not expected to do the same quantity and quality of work. Is this a legitimate act of discrimination and worthy of a lawsuit? Over the years I have gotten hurt and lost wages from doing the work the women are not required to do. Am I entitled to monetary compensation?

Asked on March 12, 2012 under Employment Labor Law, New York


SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 10 years ago | Contributor

This may well be illegal gender-based discrimination. If the women are in the same job as men (e.g. you are all stockers; it's not as if you're a stocker and they are cashiers), then you should be doing  the same work, for the same pay, under the same conditions. If you are dong more work then female employees with the same job, who are being paid the same, on its face, that is discrimination. Since the specific facts of a situation like this are critical, you should meet with an employment law attorney to review the factual situation in detail. Good luck.


IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption