Is a reaffermation agreement valid if the debt becomes unsecured?

UPDATED: Nov 17, 2011

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

UPDATED: Nov 17, 2011Fact Checked

Get Legal Help Today

Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Is a reaffermation agreement valid if the debt becomes unsecured?

I filed Chapter 7, reaffirmed my auto loan, and about 4 months later I totaled the car. The finance company released the lien off the title and took the money the auto insurer offered. Does that agreement still apply or since now the debt is unsecured it’s void.

Asked on November 17, 2011 under Bankruptcy Law, Missouri


Robert Braverman / Law Office of Robert Braverman, LLC

Answered 11 years ago | Contributor

When you filed the bankruptcy, the lien remained on your car but you had the ability to eliminate any personal liability, for example, where you surrender car and it sells for less than you owe. When you signed the reaffirmation agreement, in effect you took the vehicle out of the bankruptcy and your obligations to the lender would be the same as if you never filed bankruptcy. As a result, if the insurance did not payoff the loan, since you reaffirmed the note to the lender (the bankruptcy did not impact the lien which remained on the car) you would be responsible for the deficiency. Perhaps you or your attorney can negotiate a settlement reducing any balance under these circumstances.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption