If we sign a 2-year lease which states that rent will increase $50 after the first year, are we still entitled to a written notice about the increase?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
If we sign a 2-year lease which states that rent will increase $50 after the first year, are we still entitled to a written notice about the increase?
If we sign a 2-year lease, which states that rent will increase $50 after the first year, are we still entitled to a written notice? We have been in our apartment for 2.5 years, and we were just told that we owe $900 for back rent. Is this legal? It’s been been 18 months since the increase was supposed to take place. They never said anything to us, and have been cashing our rent checks.
Asked on July 31, 2012 under Real Estate Law, California
Answers:
Cameron Norris, Esq. / Law Office of Gary W. Norris
Answered 11 years ago | Contributor
You could argue that they waived the right to the increased amount by accepting the checks. I wouldn't pay the extra money and I would fight them in court if they try to collect on it. In addition, if they try to take that extra $900 out of your deposit you can remind them of, and sue under CCP 1950.5, which punishes landlords who in bad faith retain deposits by awarding up to triple damages. I would consult with a local real estate attorney if the landlord doesn't shape up. As far as future checks are concerned--you appear to be on the hook for the $50 increase.
Best of luck.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.