If I was prescribed a medication for extreme morning sickness during my pregnancy and then my son was born with developmental delays, can I sue for malpractice?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
If I was prescribed a medication for extreme morning sickness during my pregnancy and then my son was born with developmental delays, can I sue for malpractice?
The dosage was increased, which still did not help, and I was later prescribed the Zofran pump/IV for a constant dosage. My son was born premature and has developmental delays (gross motor, fine motor, speech, and oral motor) that require multiple therapies. Is this grounds for a medical malpractice suit?
Asked on February 16, 2015 under Malpractice Law, North Carolina
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 9 years ago | Contributor
It *may* be grounds for a suit. The two key issues are:
1) Is there a causal link--that is, did the medicine cause the developmental delays. The fact that two things occured together do not prove that one caused the other: to use an admittedly obvious example, it's very likely that you watched TV and listened to music during your pregnancy, and also probably ate or drank something with caffeine at some point (soda, tea, iced tea, coffee, chocolate, etc.), but that doesn't mean that the TV, music, or caffeine caused your son's problems.
For a lawsuit, you'll ultimately need an expert medical opinion, such as from some doctor, that links the medicine to the developmental delays. If you don't have that at present (i.e. don't have some determination or opinion from one or more of your or your son's doctors that the medicine caused the problem), then to at least seriously consider a lawsuit, you should, at a minimum, look for well-regarded medical literature or studies (such as in medical journals or at least respected national media) which show that this type of medicine can cause this type of issue. If you can't find any support to show that the medicine caused the developmental delays, then you likely do not have a viable lawsuit. If you can't show a causal link, there is no legal claim.
2) Even if the medicine could in some cases cause these problems, then the next issue is whether it was careless or unreasonable to prescribe it for you. If the likelihood or probability of the harm was very remote, and meanwhile you were suffering greatly from the extreme morning sickness, then it may have been reasonable to prescribe. For example, say the chance of the medicine causing the delays is 1 in a million; with such strong odds against a problem, with you suffering greatly, giving you the medicine may have been a reasonable medical decision. (Doctors do not need to be perfect; they just need to make well-informed, reasonable decisions.) So not only do you need to know if the medicine could have caused the problems, but you need to have some sense or idea for how likely that are--at least at the dosage you were taking--since that will help determine whether the doctors made the right call or not.
You should speak with an experienced medical malpractice attorney--many provide a free initial consultation, and you can ask about this before making the appointment. The lawyer can help you understand what you'd need for a case, evaluate the strength of you case and what it might be worth economically, and also advise as to what it might cost you to bring a case, since all those factors must be considered.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.