What to do if my former landlord is claiming that I owe money for floor damage that was already there when I first moved in?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What to do if my former landlord is claiming that I owe money for floor damage that was already there when I first moved in?
I have 5 signed affidavits verifying the damage was there when first moved in. We met yesterday for mediation. We offered to pay for damages and court fees but not attorney’s fees (which is the landlord’s husband). They refused. The landlord was not there personally, only her husband. Does it seem that I should have a solid case with the witnesses and should I meet with the landlord individually to try to get he
Asked on January 24, 2012 under Real Estate Law, Florida
Answers:
FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 12 years ago | Contributor
If the former landlord is trying to assess you costs for pre-existing floor damage beofre you took possession of the rental and you have five affidavits by witnesses supporting your position, you seem to be in good shape in the event this matter goes to trial.
From what you have written, it seems that the presumed attorney's fee clause in the lease seems to be dragging this case out where the landlord via her attorney husband seems to want compensation for matters that do not seem warranted if you go to trial.
It seems that you have a good case regarding the issue of pre-existing floor damage when you moved in. I suggest that you have each of the five witnesses personally appear in court in the event of a trial.
It is always best to try and settle a matter in writing before trial based upon my experience.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.