If my bank miscalculated the taxes on my second home and they are in fact 33% higher, what can i do?

UPDATED: Jan 3, 2011

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Get Legal Help Today

Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

If my bank miscalculated the taxes on my second home and they are in fact 33% higher, what can i do?

When I bought the house (04/01/10), the payments were $1,048.46 ($813.07 principal + interest and $235.39 impound escrow+insurance), but now (01/11) the payments will become $1,398.17 ($813.07 principal + interest and $584.71 impound escrow+insurance) which I cannot afford anymore. What should I do?

Asked on January 3, 2011 under Real Estate Law, California


SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 12 years ago | Contributor

1) If the new fees are the appropriate and correct ones, you will probably have to pay them. The reason for "probably" is that you should double check your closing and loan documentation--if you are paying at the correct tax rate and correct interest rate, it *may* be the case that the bank cannot increase the amount being escrowed so long as you are meeting the fundamental obligations. That's not likely--typically, banks have considerable  discretion to decide how much to escrow--but  it's worth checking. You can--and should--also ask for an explanation for the increase.

2) If the extra $350/month is what will break you and the increase is otherwise valid, don't wait until you get into trouble--talk with you bank, explain the situation, and see if anything can be worked out. They'd undoubtedly want the extra money, but they also don't want you to default or walk away from the home, leaving them with yet another foreclosed property in a continuing down real estate market.

3) If you can show that (i) you were given the lower figure in advance by the bank and (ii) that lower figure was a material, or important, factor in your buying the home--i.e. that you wouldn't have bought it at the higher figure--you may have grounds if necessary for a lawsuit against the bank on the basis that they made material representations which induced you to buy the home.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption