how can i tell if the replacement value for carpeting compares to a purchase from 1999 for which I have the receipt?

UPDATED: Sep 30, 2022

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

UPDATED: Sep 30, 2022Fact Checked

Get Legal Help Today

Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

how can i tell if the replacement value for carpeting compares to a purchase from 1999 for which I have the receipt?

In 1999 paid 2.77 per sq ft for carpet, pad, installation using a discount coupon to arrive at that price. Insurance replacement value estimate is 4.76. Does this seem a reasonable estimate? The adjuster states an independent carpet analysis was used to arrive at their amount. This may not be a legal question but I am at a loss as to how to determine if this is fair. I already had to get a replacement quote for kitchen cabinets as they were undervalued – we are using a Public Adjuster but I am doing more of the scrutinizing and follow up work.

Asked on February 29, 2016 under Insurance Law, Illinois


SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 6 years ago | Contributor

The issue is what is the cost today to replace with comparable quality; it isn't a matter of adjusting for inflation or finding the today-equivalent of yesterday's cost, but rather replacing what was damaged or ruined with the equivalent quality & type (or as close as you can reasonably get: after 17 years, a very close match may no longer be available). The best way to figure out if what you're offer is faired is to source out as close a comparable replacment as possible, and see what that would cost.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption