Does an employer have to reimburse or pay for mandatory classes which were not a condition of employment?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Does an employer have to reimburse or pay for mandatory classes which were not a condition of employment?
My job made it mandatory for it’s employees to take a class outside of working hours. They will not pay for the class or pay our hourly rate. Also, they said that if we did not take the class, that we would lose our hours at work, and hinted at possibly being fired. The payment came from our own pockets. Nothing that was signed by us said that we would have to pay for any work related “training”, nor was this a condition of employment when I started. I may not like my job, but it is a job none the less. Are there any laws governing this?
Asked on July 15, 2011 under Employment Labor Law, California
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 13 years ago | Contributor
The terms, conditions, and requirements of your job are not static; they may change over time, and the employer may add new conditions or requirements, as long as there is no actual employment contract to the contrary. Therefore, whether or not this training was a requirement when you started is most likely not an issue.
Furthermore, a company may require employees to fulfill certain requirements, get certain training, etc. as part of their employment, and may even require the employees to pay for it themselves. Companies may discipline or fire employees who do not comply.
However, if you are an hourly employee, it may be the case that if you are ordered or required by your employer to get the training, that the time spent in training constitutes work time for which you must be paid, since any time you are told you do something by your employer and have to do that thing for the employer's benefit or at its behest may be considered work. This would not apply to a salaried employee, in that he or she would not be entitled to extra pay, but an hourly employee might be. Whether it's worth fighting with your employer for the amount of money at stake is a different issue, one should consider before doing or saying anything.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.