Does a merchant have to visually prove that you concealed an item in order to convict you of a shoplifting charge?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Does a merchant have to visually prove that you concealed an item in order to convict you of a shoplifting charge?
Example: merchant stopped you before left store, found items in your purse, found tags that match in bathroom where you were, but only saw you enter dressing room with merchandise (lots of it) and leave without specific items which were coincidentally found in your purse. How can they prove it’s not just a coincidence that you brought those same/similar items with you to match up to purchased needed if they don’t 100% know what you brought in with you?
Asked on July 31, 2010 under Criminal Law, Michigan
Answers:
M.T.G., Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 13 years ago | Contributor
Its a good story and I can see the creativity in the "coincidental" findings as they relate to the merchandise, but I think that all the circumstantial evidence point a different way. I would suggest that you seek legal help in your area as to the matter and what constitutes enough to convict you of shoplifting. I think the tags in the bathroom are what pushed me over the edge here. It is a little TOO coincidental. And I guarantee that they were watching you long before you knew. They have to convict beyond a reasonable doubt. They do not have to 100% sure. Get legal help. Good luck.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.