Do I have a medical malpractice case in the death of my dad?

UPDATED: Oct 1, 2022

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

UPDATED: Oct 1, 2022Fact Checked

Get Legal Help Today

Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Do I have a medical malpractice case in the death of my dad?

My father was diagnosed with a rare and
aggressive cancer in August 2016. He passed
away March 2017. The cancer is linked to the
use of an injectible fluid used in MRIs and can
take about 30 years to appear. Well, 30 years
ago, my dad had an MRI using this injectible
fluid. Do I have a case? I want justice for my

Asked on September 13, 2017 under Malpractice Law, Illinois


SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 5 years ago | Contributor

You have our sympathy for your loss. Unfortunately, you most likely do not have a case.
First and foremost, whether something is malpractice is not judged by current medical knowledge; it is judged by what was known *at the time* the procedure was done. Malpractice is providing medical care that does not meet the then-currently accepted standards for care. Medical care improves over time--to use an extreme example, during the Civil War, amputations of gunshot limbs without anesthetic was considered the best care, but nowadays, we know far better. Civil war surgeons who cut off gunshot limbs were not doing malpractice; they were doing the best they could, even if we nowadays cringe at that treatment.
Similarly, if 30 years that fluid was considered a safe and appropriate diagnostic tool, it was not malpractice to use it, even if we have learned better since then. So you'd have to show that 30 years ago, it was considered risky or dangerous to use that fluid in order to potentially have a case.
Second, even if the use of that fluid was already being questioned 30 years ago, you'd need to be able to prove to a reasonable certainty (i.e. by a "preponderance of the evidence") by medical evidence (e.g. by the testimony of doctors who examined your father, who linked, based on medical evidence, his cancer to that fluid) that cancer resulting 30 years later was caused by that fluid and not by other generic or environmental factors, and that can be very difficult to do.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption