Canadian Court Rules Detainees Can Search for Lawyers Online
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Feb 25, 2013
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
In Alberta, Canada, a judge has decided that detainees have the right to use online search engines to find legal representation.
The ruling comes from a case involving a 19-year-old man picked up for a DUI-related charge. The young man was offered a Yellow Pages directory and a landline, according to this news source. Seemingly, having little familiarity with this method of searching and contacting people or businesses, today’s youth may find it difficult to access appropriate representation while in custody. People who grew up in the 2000s will likely have only used Internet sources as a directory and may look at a phone book and landline the way a dvd-toting product of the 1990s might scoff at a record player.
In addition, most attorneys advertise on websites today as much as, if not more so, than through traditional phone books. Attorney ads online tend to be focused to various client needs and search engines make it easier for a person to pinpoint the type and cost of a wide selection of local attorneys.
When asked which source would be best for the detainee in question, he said Google, according to reports. He also had access to 411 phone services but said this was not better than the phone book option.
With the right of all detainees to have access to an attorney and given today’s technological setting, the court ruled in favor of the 19-year-old, with potential to set a precedent for other courts to follow suit. It would not be surprising to see similar initiatives follow in American courts.