Can I sue the city or builder?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Can I sue the city or builder?
My home was built 12 years ago and I purchased it 7 years ago. My entire house has flooded twice and the garage 4 times due to storm drain issues. The house is not near any lakes, rivers, etc. Per a civil engineer who I consulted, the original plans for the neighborhood, included a settling pond that was never built. Also, the builder graded my lot a foot lower than the original plan. As a result, I get flooded, with the severity depending on if we are home to put out sandbags or not. I was told by a real estate that no one would buy my house and most likely an agent wouldn’t even list it. He suggested that I get another house and let this one foreclose. Should I walk away? Can I seek compensation from the builder or the city?
Asked on June 19, 2019 under Real Estate Law, Georgia
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 4 years ago | Contributor
1) The city is not liable for not having built the settling pond since, regardless of whether building it would be a good idea or not, the city was under no legal obligation to build the pond. Without a legal obligation, there is no liability.
2) At 12 years since building, it is too late to take legal action against the builder for any negligent construction or design (regarding the grading): in your state, the "statute of repose" which defines the latest you can possibly sue for a "construction defect" is only 8 years.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.