Can I sue my mortgage company for not taking a short sale offer on my home that was $34,000 more than what they sold it for?

UPDATED: Dec 5, 2011

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

UPDATED: Dec 5, 2011Fact Checked

Get Legal Help Today

Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Can I sue my mortgage company for not taking a short sale offer on my home that was $34,000 more than what they sold it for?

I lost $3000in relocation and now I have a foreclosure rather than short sale on my credit record. We had the house sold for $154,000, 3 different times and the last time the bank wouldn’t wait another 7 days for the financing to come through. They sold the house months later for $34,000 less. We left the home as soon as we knew we couldn’t pay the mortgage any longer so that the home could be sold ASAP. We left the home in great shape and removed nothing. I really frustrates me that we tried to do the right thing and the Bank handled things so poorly. Can anything be done?

Asked on December 5, 2011 under Real Estate Law, Arizona


SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 11 years ago | Contributor

Unfortunately, a bank is under no legal obligation whatsoever to accept or approve a short sale, and is therefore  not liable for not doing so. Or more accurately: you always could have sold your home "short" if you wanted to--as long as you were willing to make up the difference between the sale proceeds and the balance due on the mortgage out of your own pocket. The law does not require a bank to agree to accept a sale for less than the full remaining balance of the mortgage as payment in full of the mortgage--the bank is not obligated to accept a loss on the mortgage. Since they are not required to do this, you cannot hold them liable for not doing it. Even if in retrospect it would have been better for all concerned if they had approved the short sale, the law does not force them to make the best or fairest decisions.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption