Can a joint account be garnished if only one of the account holders owes the debt?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Can a joint account be garnished if only one of the account holders owes the debt?
Asked on November 19, 2010 under Bankruptcy Law, Kentucky
Answers:
M.D., Member, California and New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 14 years ago | Contributor
The law on garnishments varies from state-to-state. However, typically, a bank account that is jointly owned by a debtor and non-debtor ( a joint account) can be garnished. Once a garnishment is ordered a debtor should receive notice from the court that issued the order. In most jurisdictions a debtor has 30 days or more to file for an exemption with the court before the money is actually removed from the account. A debtor can file an exemption stating that the money in the checking account is not theirs (or only partially theirs). Proof will be needed to back this claim up (a direct deposit receipt or a deposit slip and copy of the non-debtor's paycheck, etc). If the money has already been removed from the joint account and the creditor did not receive the entire amount owed, it can go back to court to obtain another garnishment order. Additional orders can be placed by the creditor until the entire debt amount has been collected. To avoid any additional garnishments of the non-debtor's money, they should stop making deposits into the account in question (as well as into any account with the debtor's name on it).
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.