Asked by company owners to spy and intercept communications to be used as evidence for termination of company President. Do I have a case?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Asked by company owners to spy and intercept communications to be used as evidence for termination of company President. Do I have a case?
As the person overseeing the company’s computer network operation, I was asked by the owners to spy and intercept person’s personal and business electronic communications to collect evidence of ill intent toward the owners. The content discovered through eavesdropping caused severe stress on both my working and personal relationships. Prior to his termination, I was accused by the President of spying and received harsh criticism and questioning. I was asked by owners to lie and continue intercepting comm. Stress caused and impact on my life is beyond my ability to put into words.
Asked on June 3, 2009 under Employment Labor Law, Florida
Answers:
J.M.A., Member in Good Standing of the Connecticut Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 14 years ago | Contributor
In the united states you can sue for just about anything. In this case, your claims apears to be that you suffered emotional distress from the company's actions. Whether you can say this conduct was extreme and outrageous appears to be a question of fact that can be determined by a judge or jury. If you really feel that suing the company and/or the owners is what you want to do, i suggest hiring a lawyer to sue them. You should gather all the documents you have as proof and bring them to a lawyer that will take your case. Hopefully, the owners will settle to avoid the exposure/humiliation, but you have to be prepared to go the distance.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.