If a credit card collector failed to serve me a summons but there is a hearing on the case in about a week’s time, is it wise to go to the hearing?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
If a credit card collector failed to serve me a summons but there is a hearing on the case in about a week’s time, is it wise to go to the hearing?
I owe a credit card company who has filed a suit. So far, they failed to serve me a summons but I was able to get a copy of the summons from the debt counsellors trying to help me out. From what the summons says, there will be a hearing on my case in one week’s time, despite not being served a summons directly. The debt counselors say it rather late to reply the summons and that my best move is court on hearing day to make my case for hardship and ask for more time. Is this a sound advice? I owe this card company $34K but have other pressing creditors too. What are the most acceptable cases for hardship and what are the chances of garnishing my income?
Asked on April 25, 2012 under Bankruptcy Law, California
Answers:
M.T.G., Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 12 years ago | Contributor
What is the hearing for? Is it for a default judgement? If they get a default then yes, they can garnish. I think that it is always wise to answer and raise an affirmative defense of service in the answer. And yes, I would indeed show up in court. Some counties have lawyers for a day or attorneys that do pro bono work in the court to help those like you. Try and speak with them. You have a substantial amount of debt. You could consult with an attorney as to your option besides claiming hardship. Good luck.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.