3 siblings own property together, Undivided 1/3 interest. Can two of the siblings make the other sibling buy them out or focre the sale of the home?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
3 siblings own property together, Undivided 1/3 interest. Can two of the siblings make the other sibling buy them out or focre the sale of the home?
Summit Co. OHIO. 3 siblings own a property together, Undivided 1/3 interest. Property is paid off and was obtained through their father’s death. None of the chilkdren lived in the home for the past 10 years. One sibling is living in home, (after the title transfer, about 3 months) not paying any form of rent to the other two. The two non-resident sibilings would like to sell the home outright or have the other sibling buy them out. Resident sibling is unable/unwilling to buy out other siblings and will not allow home to be put up for sale or vacate the home.
Asked on June 3, 2009 under Real Estate Law, Ohio
Answers:
S.J.H., Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 14 years ago | Contributor
The sibling living in the home has every right to be there and unfortunately to live there rent free until told otherwise by the court. The only option is for one or both of the other siblings to file a partition action. This is an action for a party to obtain their interst in the house. Since the house cannot be physically divided it will come doen to money. If the sibling who resides there wants to continue doing so, he would have to buy the other siblings interest out of the premises. It is a relatively clear cut proceeding although each state varies on the various reasons that it could be denied. Usually it would be a showing of hardship on the part of the person seeking to deny the sale. In this event, the court may allow him to stay but may require him to pay all real estate taxes and even rent to the other siblings. Hardsip is very hard to prove under any defiinition and if there no mortgage it will be nearly impossible.
M.D., Member, California and New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 14 years ago | Contributor
You don't state how you all hold title, as joint tenants or tenants in common. However, while there is a distinction legally, as a practical matter under your facts it probably won't matter.
Since one sister can't buy out the other two, the two wanting to sell with have to go to court to seek their relief. The court then has one of two choices, it can partition the property in question or force a sale. In this instance partition of a single-family home would be impractical, so a forced sale would be the solution. Proceeds would be then be divided proportionality; here 1/3 each.
The above will hold true absent some extenuating circumstances which you have not presented here. I don't think your sister's occupancy will change matters.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.