$100M Newtown School Shooting Lawsuit Dropped
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Jan 2, 2013
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
A lawsuit filed on behalf of a young survivor of the tragic Newtown school shooting, has been withdrawn. The $100M suit, filed by attorney Irving Pinsky, was brought against the state of Connecticut for failure to prevent the emotional and psychological injury sustained by an unidentified 6-year-old, reports say.
Pinsky maintains that he is withdrawing the case in order to evaluate newly surfaced evidence, as the investigation into the massacre continues, according to an article in CT Post. Among the claims is the accusation that Sandy Hook and other education authorities failed to initiate action to protect children from harm; harm that according to the lawsuit, was “foreseeable.”
Connecticut Attorney General George Jepson has made it clear in his statements to the press that to bring a legal action is not appropriate for the circumstances, according to Reuters. He goes on to say that petitioning the government to change policies would be a more effective path; and that thus far, there is no evidence to support the claim that the school or city was negligent in protecting the students.
In tragedies of this degree, it is human nature to seek out restitution; and the justice system does serve this purpose in many cases. However, many would agree that because the person responsible—the person who should be brought to justice—perished by his own hand, to turn blame on the state in attempt to recover damages may not be the appropriate course of action. It is, however, difficult to speculate how each of us would proceed in such dyer circumstances, be those of the victims’ loved ones or those injured in other unrecoverable ways.
Legally speaking, though, the validity of a claim will be left to the state commissioner, who is qualified to decide which cases are sound enough to proceed to court and which are not. And in this case, the state commissioner along with the Attorney General have determined this lawsuit is, in its current form, baseless.