What type of proof is needed to be chargedwith a minor in consumption?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What type of proof is needed to be chargedwith a minor in consumption?
I was at a party with 21+ years old people and some minors. I am minor. The police came on a noise ordinance call and entered the home without the home’s resident’s knowledge. I told the officer that I did not drink any alcohol and did not take a breathalyzer. I was issued a summons to appear in court in 11 days. What should Ido? No Miranda rights were read.
Asked on January 5, 2012 under Criminal Law, New Jersey
Answers:
FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 12 years ago | Contributor
In order to prove the charge of a minor in possession of alcohol the prosecution has to prove beyond beyond a reasoanble doubt that you were under the age of 21 years at the time of the incident actually consumed an alcoholic beverage.
Unless the officer's police report states that he saw you consume alcoholic beverages and/or in speaking with you that there was a distinct odor of alcohol on your breath, the district attorney's office seemingly will have a difficult time proving its case against you from what you have written.
I suggest that you make the court appearance on the date, time and location of the summons you received. You should also consider consulting with a criminal defense attorney about the charge against you.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.