Is purchasing crop insurance and then destroying a crop fraud?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Is purchasing crop insurance and then destroying a crop fraud?
My mother and my uncle co-own 48.5 acres of farmland. They have been renting it to my cousin (their nephew) who plants a crop. This year my Uncle have decided to sell the land and have informed my cousin verbally that he is not to plant a crop. He planted a crop anyway. After finding out that he may lose his crop, my cousin informed my uncle that he should buy crop insurance for his crop. I think he figures that if he had to destroy the crop, he would still get a payout. I certainly don’t think my uncle is obligated to buy such insurance. Plus, isn’t this considered insurance fraud?
Asked on June 18, 2012 under Criminal Law, Michigan
Answers:
Kevin Bessant / Law Office of Kevin Bessant & Associates
Answered 11 years ago | Contributor
This issue with fraud is whether or not you had an intent to defraud the insurance company by destroying the crop. The actual destruction of the crop is not an issue because he can do what he wishes to his own property, but if he were to file an insurance claim stating a loss of the crop for reasons other than his own personal destruction of it, then upon a finding that it was destroyed purposely by the holder of the policy 1) The insurance company is not obligated to pay 2) While unlikely, the insurance company could seek criminal charges due to your Uncle's intent to defraud the company.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.